Awards Programs: Handling The Losers - Get Articles by Richard Lowe

Get Articles
 
  

submit your own reprintable article

Article Categories

Accepting Credit Cards Online
Accounting and Book-Keeping
Advertising
Affiliate and Associate Programs
Articles and Article Promotion
Autoresponders and How To Use Them
Bonuses and Freebies
Branding
Business Ideas
Business Practice
Communication Skills
Competition and Your Competitors
Copywriting
Creativity and Ideas
Customer Service and Support
Domains and Domain Names
Due Diligence
E-Commerce
Ebooks and Ebook Writing
Education
Email List Building
Email Marketing
Ethics and Morals
Expert Status
Ezines and Email Newsletters
Family
Forums
Fraud and Scams
Goal Setting
Graphics and Graphic Design
Guarantees
Health
Internet Auctions
Internet Marketing
Investment and Investing
Job and Career
Joint Ventures
Lead Generation
Legislation and Legal Issues
Management and Best Practice
Motivation
Negotiation
Networking
News Releases and Public Relations
Niche Marketing
Outsourcing
Pay Per Click Search Engines
PC Security and Viruses
Pricing and Supply and Demand
Product Creation
Public Speaking
Publicity
Relationship Building
Reprint Rights
Revenue Generation
Search Engines and SEO
Site Stickiness - Getting Repeat Visitors
Software Reviews
Spam - Unsolicited Commercial Email
Statistics and Tracking
Testimonials
Time Management
Traffic Generation - Getting Hits
Travel
Viral Marketing
Web Hosting
Web Site Design
Working At Home - Starting Out
Blank Page
 
Google
 

> Get Articles > Management and Best Practice > Awards Programs: Handling The Losers

Awards Programs: Handling The Losers


PDF icon Download as PDF

Richard Lowe
articlesinternet-tips.net

Internet Tips And Secrets
http://www.internet-tips.net


Copyright (C) Richard Lowe Jr. and Claudia Arevalo-Lowe, 1999-2001.

Permission is granted to reprint the following article as long as no

changes are made and the byline, copyright information, and the

resource box is included. Please let me know if you use this article

by sending an email to mailto:articlesinternet-tips.net



Article Title: Awards Programs: Handling The Losers

Author: Richard Lowe, Jr.

Contact Author: mailto:articlesinternet-tips.net

Publishing Guidelines: May be freely published w/bylines

Web Address: http://www.internet-tips.net

Autoresponder Address: mailto:article-186internet-tips.net



Sometimes it's an easy decision, sometimes it's more difficult. Occasionally you find a site which on the surface looks very good and you spend hours looking it over, comparing it to each part of your criteria. Believe me, it's those last one's that hurt the most - the site is gorgeous and wonderful, but ... it just does not meet your criteria.



So what should you do? Should I send a note to the webmaster to fill him in on what I found that was not correct? Wouldn't he or she want to know? These questions go through my mind every time I look at a site which applies for one of my awards. Should I tell them what's wrong?



NEVER. Let me be fully and completely clear about this - NEVER UNDER ANY CONDITIONS, WHETHER REQUESTED OR NOT, SEND BACK CRITICAL COMMENTS TO ANYONE WHO HAS APPLIED FOR YOUR AWARDS PROGRAM. NEVER. After all, if you apply your criteria to the letter it should be obvious why the site didn't win the award - it didn't meet the criteria.



There are lots of reasons not to tell webmasters why they didn't get your award.



There is nothing more devastating to a webmaster than getting back critical comments, especially when those comments are not anticipated. It's one thing to be in a classroom environment and receive feedback, it's entirely a different matter to have a professional webmaster tell you your site is horrible or even that the "navigation needs work".



Let's say you do send a quick note which explains, "your navigation was difficult to comprehend." Well, now the webmaster has to send you an email back asking "what do you mean?" After this, you might spend the next week trying to explain what on earth you meant. Wouldn't it be better to be working on your web site, doing your job or taking your kids to the circus? The odds of you winning this discussion are very low.



More often, you'll send the note and get back an incredibly hostile response. You have not made a friend.



And even more often, the webmaster will not send a note back to you at all. You will never hear from this person again. But the unkind words will stick in his mind. He or she will be hurt or unhappy.



Once in a while, your words may discourage what could have been a good webmaster. You may return to the site a few weeks later and find it gone ... and you will never know whether it was your comments that did it.



Once I received a comment from an awardmaster who told me, in a very long email, that my site was great but since I do not accept psychiatric sites into my own awards program he could not award me an award. Keep in mind his own criteria did not mention such a restriction. I was so furious. How dare this pinhead make that kind of comment?



I remember another woman who had a beautiful site with some non-traditional navigation (it was some floating squares and was absolutely gorgeous). She didn't get an award and received a response from the awardmaster which said her navigation was terrible. She was upset and posted a note to a newsgroup asking for a site review. Before long, she got back a dozen responses, some negative some positive. She was so confused, discouraged and unhappy. Nothing good came from the comments.



I've known many beginning webmasters who are just starting out. Of course their GeoCities and Tripod sites are lacking ... but heck, these people are beginners. What do you expect? Telling them they didn't get the award because, well, their site failed all 26 criteria points just will not make any friends and, believe me, will not help anyone.



Okay, what about honorable mention awards? Lord, I hate these ... this is a wonderful way of saying, "your site was only a little bit sucky". Come on, either give out the award or don't, but please don't hand out honorable mentions.



My opinion: honorable mention awards are the product of amateur awardmasters. Don't include them in your program.



So what should you do about those who do not win? It's simple ... don't do anything. No matter how much time you spent judging the site, just put it aside and resist any temptation to "help" or "give some advice". Move on to the next web site without looking back.



If the webmaster sends a note asking (and this has only happened to me once), well, then you can either (a) ignore the request or (b) just send a quick note saying it didn't meet the criteria. You can suggest he read the criteria again and in, say, a few months he can resubmit his site. Don't get into any details, even if he asks and says that he wants to know. Believe me, he really doesn't.



The bottom line? Keep you negative comments to yourself.





NOTE: The following information must be included if you reprint this

article:

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Richard Lowe Jr. is the webmaster of Internet Tips And Secrets. This

website includes over 1,000 free articles to improve your internet

profits, enjoyment and knowledge.

Web Site Address: http://www.internet-tips.net

Weekly newsletter: http://www.internet-tips.net/joinlist.htm

Daily Tips: mailto:internet-tipsGetResponse.com



Claudia Arevalo-Lowe is the webmistress of Internet Tips And Secrets

and Surviving Asthma. Visit her site at http://survivingasthma.com



List of articles available for reprint: mailto:article-listinternet-tips.net





How useful did you find this article?

Not at all
A little
Averagely
Fairly
Very
 


This article can be downloaded freely from http://www.get-articles.com and used on your website or in your ezine so long as the author is credited and their resource box left intact. You should not change any links in the article, and where the article is used on a website it's links should be clickable. Please see our terms and conditions page for more information: http://www.get-articles.com/authors-publishers-terms.php
 

Get Articles


Top Articles

  • Stop Saving Money!
    By Leo J Quinn Jr
    Rating 138 / 195
  • The Top Ten Reasons For Being Honest
    By Monique Rider
    Rating 152 / 180
  • Top 10 Qualities of a Great Team Leader
    By Naseem Mariam
    Rating 143 / 180
  • 7 M's of Every Highly Effective Manager
    By Alonzie Scott
    Rating 124 / 175
  • Seven "Secrets/Tips" to Becoming a Millionaire
    By Craig Lock
    Rating 97 / 140
  • Five wonderful steps for good presentation skills:
    By Thomson Chemmanoor
    Rating 44 / 75
  • Do Pop-up Ads Work for Your Site?
    By Brian Su
    Rating 41 / 70
  • How to get your audience involved in your PowerPoint presentation:
    By Thomson Chemmanoor
    Rating 27 / 70
  • TOP TEN TIPS FOR PRESCRIPTION SWIMMING GOGGLES
    By Danielle Ross
    Rating 53 / 65
  • Ten Steps to a Power-Packed, Persuasive Proposal
    By Linda Elizabeth Alexander
    Rating 46 / 65
  • Insider Rollout Secrets Review
    By Alex Poole
    Rating 52 / 55
  • The 7 Signs of a Scam
    By Sharon Davis
    Rating 42 / 50
  • How to write a communication plan
    By Matt Eliason
    Rating 38 / 50
  • The MSN Ranking Code Loophole
    By Chris Rempel and Dave Kelly
    Rating 38 / 50
  • 12-Step Foolproof Sales Letter Template
    By David Frey
    Rating 41 / 45
  • Tips For Non-Sexist Writing
    By Tanja Rosteck
    Rating 35 / 45
  • Preventing Fraud On Your Website
    By Aaron Turpen
    Rating 32 / 40
  • Useless Resume Objectives
    By Rita Fisher, CPRW
    Rating 10 / 40
  • Hacker Prevention Techniques
    By Aaron Turpen
    Rating 30 / 35
  • 6 Steps to Great Customer Service
    By Aaron Turpen
    Rating 25 / 35

    May 26, 2012 © www.Get-Articles.com. All Rights Reserved.